Topic Archives: Federal Procurement

Federal Procurement

NEW YEAR, NEW DOMESTIC PREFERENCE RESTRICTIONS: TRUMP FINAL RULE AND BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDER

Despite their many differences, Presidents Trump and Biden agree on one thing: that the Government should favor American manufacturers over foreign companies by tightening the protectionist restrictions applicable to many Federal procurements. The outgoing and incoming Administrations each took actions this January that will cheer the hearts of many American manufacturers, while dismaying advocates of ...›

Federal Procurement

Proposed Rule to Amend the Far’s Implementation of the Buy American Act

Earlier this week, the FAR Council issued a proposed rule to implement President Trump’s Executive Order 13881. The Executive Order called for the expansion of the preference for domestic goods, products, and materials – particularly domestic iron and steel – in Federal procurements. If the rule is finalized, it will amend the FAR’s implementation of ...›

Update: COVID-19/Coronavirus Webinar Series: Concerns for Government Contractors (MATERIALS)

Updated to add final materials, which can be accessed here. Replays of the webinar can be accessed here. Please join Morrison & Foerster Government Contracts + Public Procurement practice co-chair Alex Ward, and partner Dan Chudd for a webinar concerning what government contractors must know to prepare for disruptions. Topics will include: Excusable Delays and ...›

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: Keep Calm, Wash Your Hands, and Know Your Rights

As the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, invades more and more of everyday life, the chance it will affect government contracts and government contractors becomes more and more likely. These effects might include workforce reductions from those out sick, travel restrictions, base closures, or telework.  Indeed, as reported earlier this week in National Defense magazine, Representative Mac ...›

Trade Agreements Act Compliance: Federal Circuit Clarifies Country of Origin and Place of Manufacture Analyses

A variety of arcane domestic-preference regimes apply to many Federal procurements – the Buy American Act (BAA), the Trade Agreements Act (TAA), the Berry Amendment, and the Cargo Preference Act, to name a few.  In Acetris Health, LLC v. United States, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently denied a Government appeal and ...›

November 11, 2019Compliance, Federal Procurement

DOJ Takes Aim at Collusion in Government Procurement with New Strike Force

On November 5, 2019, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the creation of a new Procurement Collusion Strike Force (PCSF) focused on deterring, detecting, investigating, and prosecuting antitrust crimes, especially bid-rigging, in government procurement at the federal, state, and local levels.  This follows several criminal indictments in the past year of bid rigging among government ...›

DOD Promulgates Long-awaited Restrictions on LPTA Procurement

The Department of Defense (DOD) has promulgated the final rule restricting DOD’s use of Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) acquisition methods. The final rule adopts, without any substantive changes, the proposed rule published last December and implements sections of the National Defense Authorization Acts for FY 2017 and 2018. The final rule can be found ...›

Federal Procurement

President Issues New Domestic Preference Executive Order

The President has issued the third in a series of executive orders (EOs) directed at tightening domestic-preference restrictions in Government procurements covered by the Buy American Act (BAA).  EO 13881 orders the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (FAR Council) within 180 days to “consider proposing” a rule with the following features: (i) an amendment to the ...›

Cybersecurity

Supreme Court Removes “Substantial Competitive Harm” Requirement for Contractors Seeking to Protect Confidential Information from Release Under FOIA

You can rejoice in a recent Supreme Court decision if you have ever spent hours trying to convince a government agency not to release your company’s confidential information to the public in response to a Freedom of Information request. In a reversal of long-standing precedent in federal district and circuit courts, the Supreme Court ruled ...›